Tell me the things worth fighting for, and I just might tell you you're wrong.
Friends and family, love and peace, justice and the American way, fairness, kindness, the pursuit of happiness, God and religion, the oppressed, the exiled, the downtrodden, the poor, freedom and liberty, property, wisdom and truth, principles, honor, life, the unborn . . .
All things good are worth standing up for. There is no doubt that it is good to stick up for that which is right.
But, to fight over them?
When we pick a fight in defense of that which is good, we still pick a fight. Plead for what is right. Protest, if that will help. But, in all you do, if you can avoid the spirit of hate, do so. If you can avoid making enemies, do so. If you can avoid turning it all into a "fight," do so. Those you differ with need not be made your enemies. Reasoning need not be taken to fighting. If you can smile -- and make it a warm and genuine smile -- at those who have different values and beliefs, then that is the spirit of peace, not of a fight.
If you have wisdom, offer it in the spirit of wisdom. Offer it in a wise and gentle way. True wisdom seeks friends, not enemies. True wisdom seeks to help, not to hurt. The true giver of wisdom comes not with a sword, but with a loving arm.
Saturday, November 30, 2019
Can the Love of Capitalism become a Root of Evil?
We must be careful of heaping too much love on capitalism. Do we teach that the love of money is the root of all evil, then teach that the love of money is the foundation of a good nation? I somewhat wonder if we should be careful of who it is we see as false teachers.
Making the Rich Rich is a Goal that Deserves Second Thoughts
What do we believe in our day? That the prosperity of the rich is the measurement of a good economy? I do not find it false to aspire to be a nation where there will be no poor among us. I do not suppose at this very moment to know how to arrive there, but I know it is an honorable aspiration.
In contrast, where is the honor in filling the homes of the rich with lucre? If they should make their riches, let them. I do not know that we should tax them till they leave. I only say that when our goal is to make the rich rich, that goal might deserve some second thoughts.
In contrast, where is the honor in filling the homes of the rich with lucre? If they should make their riches, let them. I do not know that we should tax them till they leave. I only say that when our goal is to make the rich rich, that goal might deserve some second thoughts.
We Should be Wary of Those Who Lead Us Away from doing Good
There is something about all this hatred of socialism that bothers me. It takes the concept of sharing, and turns it into a sin. It lionizes money. It teaches the prosperity of the rich is the measurement of a good economy. It teaches true charity is that the poor should work a little harder.
No, I do not doubt that the poor should work, but nor do I believe that the hand of the rich should oppress them. Favor the poor, I say, and it is in that you find favor with God. Offer them work. Teach them to work. But do not turn them away. Do not look on the poor and say, This man has brought on himself his own folly, for he is a drug addict, so I will withhold my hand from helping him.
And, what, leave him in the gutter? Face flat, perhaps? After all, a drug addict or a drunk, he is.
Charity is not just for the righteous. It does not say, If you are to qualify for care, you must first qualify for heaven. If you are not tolerant of those who sin, then it is you, yourself, who sins.
I look at our nation, and the whip of hatred that is being brought against socialism. I wonder if it isn't overreach. You can paint socialism with a broad brush. And, if you paint broadly enough, you will have no room for charity and compassion.
Yes, I wonder about Satan, and his ways. I wonder at how a good well can be poisoned.
No, I do not doubt that the poor should work, but nor do I believe that the hand of the rich should oppress them. Favor the poor, I say, and it is in that you find favor with God. Offer them work. Teach them to work. But do not turn them away. Do not look on the poor and say, This man has brought on himself his own folly, for he is a drug addict, so I will withhold my hand from helping him.
And, what, leave him in the gutter? Face flat, perhaps? After all, a drug addict or a drunk, he is.
Charity is not just for the righteous. It does not say, If you are to qualify for care, you must first qualify for heaven. If you are not tolerant of those who sin, then it is you, yourself, who sins.
I look at our nation, and the whip of hatred that is being brought against socialism. I wonder if it isn't overreach. You can paint socialism with a broad brush. And, if you paint broadly enough, you will have no room for charity and compassion.
Yes, I wonder about Satan, and his ways. I wonder at how a good well can be poisoned.
Friday, November 29, 2019
Thursday, November 28, 2019
The Art of a Lie
Lies endure by the silencing of truth. I reflect on our President, and how he attacks the press, and tells us to pay it no heed, to not belief it. If he can get us to turn from the truth, it cannot harm him. Now, I will grant that our President possibly truly believes the media is wrong, and fake, and full of lies. When belief in one's self is great enough, you will refuse to belief the truth. You will reject the truth by insisting it's a lie.
Enter our president, and his rejection of truth.
Forgive, but is is we, as well who react this way. We reject the truth the same way. When someone presents facts, and suggests they are but laying the truth before us, we attack the messenger. "That is Wikipedia?" we ask. "Well, you can't trust Wikipedia." "That is Snopes? Well, you certainly can't trust Snopes!"
Liars always insist the truth is a lie.
Instead of just taking their word on it, we should examine the facts, but that will never be done if we refuse to even look at the facts. If we have been told the sources are liars -- and we believe it -- we are left in the hands of the liars. It is so, then: If the sources of truth are silenced, the public will never have the truth.
If you can control the flow of truth, you can diminish it to lies. If you can persuade the world the honest man isn't honest, the world will be left in the hands of your dishonesty.
When the truth cannot be trusted, you are left with nothing but lies.
Enter our president, and his rejection of truth.
Forgive, but is is we, as well who react this way. We reject the truth the same way. When someone presents facts, and suggests they are but laying the truth before us, we attack the messenger. "That is Wikipedia?" we ask. "Well, you can't trust Wikipedia." "That is Snopes? Well, you certainly can't trust Snopes!"
Liars always insist the truth is a lie.
Instead of just taking their word on it, we should examine the facts, but that will never be done if we refuse to even look at the facts. If we have been told the sources are liars -- and we believe it -- we are left in the hands of the liars. It is so, then: If the sources of truth are silenced, the public will never have the truth.
If you can control the flow of truth, you can diminish it to lies. If you can persuade the world the honest man isn't honest, the world will be left in the hands of your dishonesty.
When the truth cannot be trusted, you are left with nothing but lies.
Wednesday, November 27, 2019
To Coach a Mike Conley or a Joe Ingles
Comes a Facebook post on the Utah Jazz basketball team. "Everyone wants to talk about how bad (Mike) Conley is this year and no one wants to talk about how bad (Joe) Ingles has been because he's a 'fan' favorite. . . . Ingles' numbers are worse than (those of) Conley. So why hasn't anybody been talking about this."
Conley is shooting 36.8 percent from the field, and Ingles 36.1.
Conley might feel a little betrayed by the team he came from, Memphis, and perhaps is hurting from being let go. They traded him to the Jazz to bring in a hot, new rookie, Ja Morant who is lighting a fire in Memphis. Conley must be feeling the sting, looking at what Morant is doing, and feeling hurt.
Ingles? He started for the Jazz. At the beginning of last season, he suggested he was as good of shooter as there is in the NBA. He was a confident player, having been one of the best three-point shooters in the league. Then, Kyle Korver was brought in, and it was suggested by one team official (jokingly, admittedly), that Ingles might not even be the best shooter on the team. Now, this; Now, no longer even a starter.
Confidence needs to be curried. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. Conley and Ingles -- to me -- both have clearly been hurt. Ingles might put on a brave face trying to embrace the role of sixth man, but it hurts. Conley might embrace his new team, but it hurts realizing your first love (only team he ever played for) let you go.
So, both are hurting. At least part of the solution, then, is to take away the hurt. If you are the coach, what to you do?
I'd sit Conley down, tell him not to be concerned with how Morant is doing. Let him do great. Let him be wonderful. Be happy for him. But, don't forget your own greatness. Don't forget you were good enough to be a main cog for Memphis -- sometimes, the main cog. And, there is no reason you cannot be even better. Motivate yourself. Accept the challenge. Resolve to dig deep within your soul and bring out the warrior within. Set your jaw, and your determination on being better. If you are to reach a goal, you've got to first set one. Determine to be better and better and better. Determine that whenever you shoot, the ball is going to go in. You're a 43.9 percent shooter for your career. What says you can't repeat that, or improve on it? Of course you can. It's just a matter of setting your heart, squaring your jaw, and pouring a little fierceness into it.
Ingles? I'd tell him how important he is to the team. I'd go on and on for about five minutes telling him how important he is. I'd remind him how well he has played and how -- even as a sixth-man -- he is one of the best on the team. I wouldn't challenge him to win the sixth-man award, because there's Lou Williams over on the Clippers who is clearly going to outscore him. I wouldn't give him false hope; but I'd give him great hope. I'd tell him he can be one of the best sixth men in all the league. He can be someone special on the Jazz. I'd tell him we want him to shoot when he is in, but he must return to his resolve and determination to make his shots. Then, I'd make sure who ever is in the game at the same time knows they are to get him the ball for the open shots. Don't force it to him, just make sure he gets it whenever he is open.
I'd tell both Conley and Ingles to get some fire. Play with fire. Play with a little bit of an edge. Play to show they were wrong to let you go in Memphis, Conley, and we were wrong to move you to the bench, Ingles. Everybody in the NBA has a challenge, because it is a league with the world's best players. So, what of it that you were traded, or went to the bench? Of course there are challenges in this league. Your goal is to play with the best, and find a way to be among the best.
Conley is shooting 36.8 percent from the field, and Ingles 36.1.
Conley might feel a little betrayed by the team he came from, Memphis, and perhaps is hurting from being let go. They traded him to the Jazz to bring in a hot, new rookie, Ja Morant who is lighting a fire in Memphis. Conley must be feeling the sting, looking at what Morant is doing, and feeling hurt.
Ingles? He started for the Jazz. At the beginning of last season, he suggested he was as good of shooter as there is in the NBA. He was a confident player, having been one of the best three-point shooters in the league. Then, Kyle Korver was brought in, and it was suggested by one team official (jokingly, admittedly), that Ingles might not even be the best shooter on the team. Now, this; Now, no longer even a starter.
Confidence needs to be curried. It doesn't exist in a vacuum. Conley and Ingles -- to me -- both have clearly been hurt. Ingles might put on a brave face trying to embrace the role of sixth man, but it hurts. Conley might embrace his new team, but it hurts realizing your first love (only team he ever played for) let you go.
So, both are hurting. At least part of the solution, then, is to take away the hurt. If you are the coach, what to you do?
I'd sit Conley down, tell him not to be concerned with how Morant is doing. Let him do great. Let him be wonderful. Be happy for him. But, don't forget your own greatness. Don't forget you were good enough to be a main cog for Memphis -- sometimes, the main cog. And, there is no reason you cannot be even better. Motivate yourself. Accept the challenge. Resolve to dig deep within your soul and bring out the warrior within. Set your jaw, and your determination on being better. If you are to reach a goal, you've got to first set one. Determine to be better and better and better. Determine that whenever you shoot, the ball is going to go in. You're a 43.9 percent shooter for your career. What says you can't repeat that, or improve on it? Of course you can. It's just a matter of setting your heart, squaring your jaw, and pouring a little fierceness into it.
Ingles? I'd tell him how important he is to the team. I'd go on and on for about five minutes telling him how important he is. I'd remind him how well he has played and how -- even as a sixth-man -- he is one of the best on the team. I wouldn't challenge him to win the sixth-man award, because there's Lou Williams over on the Clippers who is clearly going to outscore him. I wouldn't give him false hope; but I'd give him great hope. I'd tell him he can be one of the best sixth men in all the league. He can be someone special on the Jazz. I'd tell him we want him to shoot when he is in, but he must return to his resolve and determination to make his shots. Then, I'd make sure who ever is in the game at the same time knows they are to get him the ball for the open shots. Don't force it to him, just make sure he gets it whenever he is open.
I'd tell both Conley and Ingles to get some fire. Play with fire. Play with a little bit of an edge. Play to show they were wrong to let you go in Memphis, Conley, and we were wrong to move you to the bench, Ingles. Everybody in the NBA has a challenge, because it is a league with the world's best players. So, what of it that you were traded, or went to the bench? Of course there are challenges in this league. Your goal is to play with the best, and find a way to be among the best.
Tuesday, November 26, 2019
Monday, November 25, 2019
What has become of America? It is Lost on the Truth
What becomes of my nation? When a fact-check is given -- suggesting a meme is inaccurate or false -- rather the accept the truth, so many lash back at it, saying it is the fact-check that is the liar. I see meme after meme after meme that is false -- many undeniably wrong, quoting George Washington and others saying things they just didn't say.
Yet so many in my nation hold tightly to the same memes, regardless.
What has become of my America, that it should be so deceived and blind -- so rejecting of simple truth?
It is a nation itching to hear what it wants to hear, lashing out, one against another. I hear the gnashing of teeth -- as it seems to me -- of devils, as they use foulness of tongue and spiteful language on those they count as their foes. I read a post saying we need to educate Americans of the truth (for they call their falsehoods truth). And, I think of the news channels of our day, devoted to promoting not both sides of the story, but created just to carry the arguments of one party, to teach what that party suggests is the truth.
And, I think of the scripture. "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And, they shall turn their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." (2nd Timothy 4:3-4)
I would imagine this scripture foretells of a rejecting of religious teachings. But, I cannot but see how it so also squares with what is happening -- large scale -- in America, politically.
(Note: One sentence added Nov. 26th.)
Yet so many in my nation hold tightly to the same memes, regardless.
What has become of my America, that it should be so deceived and blind -- so rejecting of simple truth?
It is a nation itching to hear what it wants to hear, lashing out, one against another. I hear the gnashing of teeth -- as it seems to me -- of devils, as they use foulness of tongue and spiteful language on those they count as their foes. I read a post saying we need to educate Americans of the truth (for they call their falsehoods truth). And, I think of the news channels of our day, devoted to promoting not both sides of the story, but created just to carry the arguments of one party, to teach what that party suggests is the truth.
And, I think of the scripture. "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And, they shall turn their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." (2nd Timothy 4:3-4)
I would imagine this scripture foretells of a rejecting of religious teachings. But, I cannot but see how it so also squares with what is happening -- large scale -- in America, politically.
(Note: One sentence added Nov. 26th.)
Sunday, November 24, 2019
The Scriptures Would have Us Love Nancy Pelosi and Donald Trump
A politician knows only politics. Love is lost on him. He doesn't sit thinking about how, if he is to live the gospel, he (or she) should love others. He doesn't think on how that is the greatest commandment. He doesn't consider that if love is what it is all about, he should be loving those around him, including his enemies.
And, as the politician goes, so goes those who follow after politics. As is the politician, so are the adherents of politics. They spew out hatred toward each other. And, should they ever stop to consider a scripture, they will surely find one to justify their hatred.
As if the first and great commandment is not, Love thy neighbor as thyself.
Who is your neighbor? It is a Democrat, if you are a Republican. It is a Republican, if you are a Democrat. It is the immigrants. It is Colin Kaepernick. It is the person with a gun, and the person without a gun. It is Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton. It is George W. Bush. It is Mitch McConnell and Devin Nunes. It is all twelve of the impeachment witnesses.
And, it is Donald Trump. For me, he is the difficult one. I do see so much wrong with what he is doing. But, I am commanded to love him. What can I do to show my love? Do I, indeed, love him?
A love of God and of all men? That doesn't leave anyone out. If our religion is as important as our politics, we will not leave it out of the process. And, if our religion is more important -- if it is it that which guides us and not our politics -- we will find a way to love all men.
And, as the politician goes, so goes those who follow after politics. As is the politician, so are the adherents of politics. They spew out hatred toward each other. And, should they ever stop to consider a scripture, they will surely find one to justify their hatred.
As if the first and great commandment is not, Love thy neighbor as thyself.
Who is your neighbor? It is a Democrat, if you are a Republican. It is a Republican, if you are a Democrat. It is the immigrants. It is Colin Kaepernick. It is the person with a gun, and the person without a gun. It is Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton. It is George W. Bush. It is Mitch McConnell and Devin Nunes. It is all twelve of the impeachment witnesses.
And, it is Donald Trump. For me, he is the difficult one. I do see so much wrong with what he is doing. But, I am commanded to love him. What can I do to show my love? Do I, indeed, love him?
A love of God and of all men? That doesn't leave anyone out. If our religion is as important as our politics, we will not leave it out of the process. And, if our religion is more important -- if it is it that which guides us and not our politics -- we will find a way to love all men.
Saturday, November 23, 2019
If They did Perform These War Crimes, Should We Really be Offering Clemency?
Would take a little study, to get a more definite feel for those President Trump is granting clemency to for war crimes.
But, I certainly wonder about what our president is doing. If they did commit war crimes, they are the last people we should be wanting to grant clemency to. If a president grants them clemency, and they did perform the war crimes, does it mean he thinks such actions are justifiable?
Have we reached this point: that we justify war crimes, and grant the perpetrators pardons?
I wonder if any previous president has ever given passes to war criminals. Is this a first? And, what does it reflect of the morals of our nation? For it would seem many Americans are indifferent to what the president is doing, and many support him.
But, I certainly wonder about what our president is doing. If they did commit war crimes, they are the last people we should be wanting to grant clemency to. If a president grants them clemency, and they did perform the war crimes, does it mean he thinks such actions are justifiable?
Have we reached this point: that we justify war crimes, and grant the perpetrators pardons?
I wonder if any previous president has ever given passes to war criminals. Is this a first? And, what does it reflect of the morals of our nation? For it would seem many Americans are indifferent to what the president is doing, and many support him.
Friday, November 22, 2019
Thursday, November 21, 2019
An Ethical Nation Should Recognize Right from Wrong
Do we, as a people, still know right from wrong? Are we so blinded by politics that we refuse to see justice? Look at the impeachment proceedings -- and wonder.
A string of witnesses comes before Congress, testifying that money was dangled before the Ukrainians that they could only claim if they would come after Joe Biden, President Trump's political opponent. Now, the Ukrainians have been famous for corruption, and it would be a good thing to tell them to clean up their corruption across the board before they could have the money. But, to tell them you only have one case in mind, that you just want to zero in on a case that connects with your political opponent?
We, as a nation, cannot see that is wrong?
This string of witnesses, it does so seem to me that their testimony on the whole is every bit as persuasive as the testimonies that we have everyday in our criminal courts. You even have one witness, Gordon Sondland, who says he delivered the message to the Ukrainians. Isn't that somewhat like having the get-away driver testifying?
But, no, we don't believe them, these witnesses?
Or, is it that we don't think what he did was all that bad? Forgive, but, yes, withholding the money until the Ukrainians agree to go after your political opponent and dig up dirt on him is wrong. An ethical nation should recognize this.
A string of witnesses comes before Congress, testifying that money was dangled before the Ukrainians that they could only claim if they would come after Joe Biden, President Trump's political opponent. Now, the Ukrainians have been famous for corruption, and it would be a good thing to tell them to clean up their corruption across the board before they could have the money. But, to tell them you only have one case in mind, that you just want to zero in on a case that connects with your political opponent?
We, as a nation, cannot see that is wrong?
This string of witnesses, it does so seem to me that their testimony on the whole is every bit as persuasive as the testimonies that we have everyday in our criminal courts. You even have one witness, Gordon Sondland, who says he delivered the message to the Ukrainians. Isn't that somewhat like having the get-away driver testifying?
But, no, we don't believe them, these witnesses?
Or, is it that we don't think what he did was all that bad? Forgive, but, yes, withholding the money until the Ukrainians agree to go after your political opponent and dig up dirt on him is wrong. An ethical nation should recognize this.
Wednesday, November 20, 2019
Bribery and the Art of Campaign Contributions
Wikipedia tells us, "Bribery is defined by Black's Law Dictionary as the offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any item of value to influence the actions of an official or other person in charge of public or legal duty."
I wish an offshoot of the impeachment investigation would be a realization that so many campaign contributions fit within this definition. What do we do, then? Do we start prosecuting?
I wish an offshoot of the impeachment investigation would be a realization that so many campaign contributions fit within this definition. What do we do, then? Do we start prosecuting?
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
Monday, November 18, 2019
Perhaps They Should Resign if They Won't Consider Impeachment
We should be demanding that our leaders in Washington uphold the Constitution. Our senators and representatives are bound by an oath of office to uphold the Constitution. And the Constitution says, "The President . . . shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for . . . Bribery . . ."
I have a Facebook friend who posts, saying those senators who have said they will not look at evidence of impeachment should resign. I reply to the effect that I don't know that I would go that far. Calling for them to resign seems a little much.
I think some more on it, however, and realize they should be required to uphold the Constitution. The words of that document are very clear. You impeach a president if he commits a bribe. You have not choice. You've sworn to uphold the Constitution. If you will not even consider evidence when the charge of bribery comes up, you are throwing the Constitution to the wind and disregarding it. I'm still giving it thought. But, yes, perhaps they, themselves, should be removed from office if they violate the Constitution.
I have a Facebook friend who posts, saying those senators who have said they will not look at evidence of impeachment should resign. I reply to the effect that I don't know that I would go that far. Calling for them to resign seems a little much.
I think some more on it, however, and realize they should be required to uphold the Constitution. The words of that document are very clear. You impeach a president if he commits a bribe. You have not choice. You've sworn to uphold the Constitution. If you will not even consider evidence when the charge of bribery comes up, you are throwing the Constitution to the wind and disregarding it. I'm still giving it thought. But, yes, perhaps they, themselves, should be removed from office if they violate the Constitution.
Sunday, November 17, 2019
Saturday, November 16, 2019
Colin Kaepernick is Standing for What's Right
Standing for what's right can get you cut down. Is there any well-known member of our society more exemplifying this than Colin Kaepernick?
Few people are so hated.
Since he began kneeling in protest of the way African-Americans are treated, he has been blackballed, exiled, and thrown out of the league.
What is the saying? Stand for what is right, even when it isn't popular? He is standing against bigotry, and for equality. Those are good things he fights for.
Statistics do show African-Americans are jailed more than Caucasians. And, we can look at the police violence situations and see African-Americans are more likely to be victims. Whether we agree with Kaepernick on all of his political and social issue stands, we should want to stand with him in those things that are right.
And, I wonder how we can deny the statistics on how African-Americans are treated.
Standing for truth can leave you without friends, but it does not leave you without honor.
Few people are so hated.
Since he began kneeling in protest of the way African-Americans are treated, he has been blackballed, exiled, and thrown out of the league.
What is the saying? Stand for what is right, even when it isn't popular? He is standing against bigotry, and for equality. Those are good things he fights for.
Statistics do show African-Americans are jailed more than Caucasians. And, we can look at the police violence situations and see African-Americans are more likely to be victims. Whether we agree with Kaepernick on all of his political and social issue stands, we should want to stand with him in those things that are right.
And, I wonder how we can deny the statistics on how African-Americans are treated.
Standing for truth can leave you without friends, but it does not leave you without honor.
Friday, November 15, 2019
The Constitution Speaks Loud and Clear on This
Utah Senator Mike Lee, co-chair of President Trump's reelection campaign in Utah, says the President has done nothing that is impeachable.
Yes, Senator Lee is considered an expert on the Constitution, so I wonder how he reconciles the Constitution specifically mentioning bribery. "The President . . . shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for . . . Bribery . . ."
If we believe in upholding the highest law of the land, if we believe our leaders should be honorable, and if we believe that bribery is wrong, we will listen to the Founding Fathers. They felt strongly enough about bribery that they placed this in the Constitution. Back then, there probably wasn't a quid-pro-quo litmus test on what constituted bribery. They knew wrong was wrong and bribery was wrong, period.
If we uphold the Constitution, we must consider gravely on the charges against President Trump. If we find that going by the standards the Founding Fathers had, then it was bribery, then our allegiance to the Constitution and our faith in the Constitution give us little choice but to impeach the President.
Yes, Senator Lee is considered an expert on the Constitution, so I wonder how he reconciles the Constitution specifically mentioning bribery. "The President . . . shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for . . . Bribery . . ."
If we believe in upholding the highest law of the land, if we believe our leaders should be honorable, and if we believe that bribery is wrong, we will listen to the Founding Fathers. They felt strongly enough about bribery that they placed this in the Constitution. Back then, there probably wasn't a quid-pro-quo litmus test on what constituted bribery. They knew wrong was wrong and bribery was wrong, period.
If we uphold the Constitution, we must consider gravely on the charges against President Trump. If we find that going by the standards the Founding Fathers had, then it was bribery, then our allegiance to the Constitution and our faith in the Constitution give us little choice but to impeach the President.
Thursday, November 14, 2019
Laura Cooper Testifies that Assistance was being Withheld
"So, by the 26th, all I had to go on was that the President is concerned about corruption in Ukraine and somehow therefore we were holding security assistance." -- Laura Cooper, deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russian, Ukrainian and Eurasian affairs
Wednesday, November 13, 2019
He who asks a question
quicker than he answers it
is open to revelation.
How can a revelation come if you do not listen for or seek an answer? If you hear a matter, and a question is posed by it, and your presuppositions and biases supply a ready answer instead of listening for one, that is the end of it. There will be no revelation because you have not sought it, but rather have been satisfied with your own learning, which are usually the judgments of the word.
Tuesday, November 12, 2019
Make America Great Again
Measure a people by their love of each other
Measure a society by their care for the poor
In goodness and virtue, the health of a nation
Is determined by measures that go to the core
Make America great again?
Don't even give it a thought
If the values you speak of
And all your aspirations
Are only things that might make us rot
Make America great again?
Make it good before great
Make it a land where the people are caring
And whose hearts are not turned to hate
Measure a society by their care for the poor
In goodness and virtue, the health of a nation
Is determined by measures that go to the core
Make America great again?
Don't even give it a thought
If the values you speak of
And all your aspirations
Are only things that might make us rot
Make America great again?
Make it good before great
Make it a land where the people are caring
And whose hearts are not turned to hate
Monday, November 11, 2019
Joe Biden wouldn't be the Worst of Choices
A hurried study, it be, but I am studying Joe Biden, his son Hunter, and the Ukraine thing. Early on, I feel Joe is getting wrongly taken to the woodshed by President Trump, and I find myself thinking to vote for Biden, partially out of protest for the smear job President Trump is doing, and partially out the the thought that I like Biden for being moral enough to protest the prosecutor in Ukraine for not doing his job and going after corruption.
There is no evidence Biden so much as hinted the prosecutor should abandon the investigation of the company Hunter worked for. No. Instead, Joe Biden wanted the prosecutor ousted because he was too lax on investigating corruption.
Did you get that? He wanted the prosecutor out not because he was investigation too deeply, but because he wasn't.
Well, things are not always what they seem. Maybe an investigation by a U.S. intelligence agency would turn up a different story, so I am not against an investigation. But, on basis of what we do know, Trump's accusations against Biden are definitely uncalled for. Smear politics. Smear campaigning. Not that President Trump doesn't believe what he is doing against Biden is just. But, his haste to find fault against the former vice president is blinding him to the facts -- and those facts do not support the allegations he is smearing Biden with.
Well, Aa quick review of Biden has led me to see he probably shouldn't be my first choice for president. Among other things, he hasn't opposed deficit spending, but rather seems to support it.
So, I restrain my thoughts of supporting him as a reaction to his being falsely accused by President Trump.
There is no evidence Biden so much as hinted the prosecutor should abandon the investigation of the company Hunter worked for. No. Instead, Joe Biden wanted the prosecutor ousted because he was too lax on investigating corruption.
Did you get that? He wanted the prosecutor out not because he was investigation too deeply, but because he wasn't.
Well, things are not always what they seem. Maybe an investigation by a U.S. intelligence agency would turn up a different story, so I am not against an investigation. But, on basis of what we do know, Trump's accusations against Biden are definitely uncalled for. Smear politics. Smear campaigning. Not that President Trump doesn't believe what he is doing against Biden is just. But, his haste to find fault against the former vice president is blinding him to the facts -- and those facts do not support the allegations he is smearing Biden with.
Well, Aa quick review of Biden has led me to see he probably shouldn't be my first choice for president. Among other things, he hasn't opposed deficit spending, but rather seems to support it.
So, I restrain my thoughts of supporting him as a reaction to his being falsely accused by President Trump.
Sunday, November 10, 2019
Words of warning unheeded
strip prophets of their value.
I read an opinion piece in the Deseret News, speaking of the Russian influence -- a wonderful and timely article. I post my comment, saying (slightly edited), "Words of warning unheeded have stripped prophets of their value -- in biblical and Book of Mormon times. These are not prophets speaking to us, warning us of the Russians, but their's are wise words of warning, the same. What becomes of our nation may depend on whether we heed them or spurn them."
\
Friday, November 8, 2019
What is Chicago, if it cannot Catch its Murderers?
What is a nation, if it cannot enforce its laws? If it cannot track down, arrest, and prosecute the criminal, what good is that nation?
I spoke of Mexico yesterday. Today, I speak of America. Or, of at least one city in it: Chicago. Only four in 10 murders are solved. That means more than half the murderers go free.
In America. At least in the Windy City.
We should do what we can to turn this statistic around. America should rally behind this city of ours. It should demand the resources and people be put in place to correct the problem.
I spoke of Mexico yesterday. Today, I speak of America. Or, of at least one city in it: Chicago. Only four in 10 murders are solved. That means more than half the murderers go free.
In America. At least in the Windy City.
We should do what we can to turn this statistic around. America should rally behind this city of ours. It should demand the resources and people be put in place to correct the problem.
Thursday, November 7, 2019
Mexico Should take Trump up on His Offer, but give it a Twist
This is opportunity for Mexico. President Trump has offered assistance. Tell him, you want not military troops, but those who will help bring the criminals to justice: investigators and agents who will arrest -- come in and extract the individuals who committed the killings from their hiding places and strongholds.
Ever a country will be hollow if it is empty of justice. If criminals commit their crimes without fear of arrest, that nation abdicates on its responsibility to provide laws that protect the people. I would wonder about Mexico. Are crimes and murders and rapes the lot of the land? Do they go unprosecuted?
I think of ISIS, and of how you kill one leader, and another steps into his shoes. I think of El Chapo, and how others stepped into his place, and the violence merely continued -- if not worsened. The arrest and conviction of El Chapo was a victory, but you must follow it with the arrest and conviction of everyone who steps in to commit a crime. The trail of successors to crime bosses does not end if they have no fear of being the successor. I don't know if Mexico can reach the point of being able to investigate, arrest, and prosecute cartel members for their individual crimes (including conspiracy to commit a crime so you are catching the bosses, as well as the operatives), but that should be the goal. You have no force as a nation if you cannot enforce your laws. As long as crime pays, you will have it.
Ever a country will be hollow if it is empty of justice. If criminals commit their crimes without fear of arrest, that nation abdicates on its responsibility to provide laws that protect the people. I would wonder about Mexico. Are crimes and murders and rapes the lot of the land? Do they go unprosecuted?
I think of ISIS, and of how you kill one leader, and another steps into his shoes. I think of El Chapo, and how others stepped into his place, and the violence merely continued -- if not worsened. The arrest and conviction of El Chapo was a victory, but you must follow it with the arrest and conviction of everyone who steps in to commit a crime. The trail of successors to crime bosses does not end if they have no fear of being the successor. I don't know if Mexico can reach the point of being able to investigate, arrest, and prosecute cartel members for their individual crimes (including conspiracy to commit a crime so you are catching the bosses, as well as the operatives), but that should be the goal. You have no force as a nation if you cannot enforce your laws. As long as crime pays, you will have it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)