Lady Liberty Self Deports
Was that Lady Liberty
Suitcases in her hands
Walking down the street?
I hear she's got travel plans
She's checking out of America
Self-deporting, I guess
No longer feels welcome
Feels that leaving is best
Don't Talk Politics
You Ask
The Avenues of Truth
All in the Name of a Flag
In the name of a flag
They pour hatred on their fellow men
In the name of a flag
They become bitter toward their own kin
All in the name of a flag
In the name of a flag
They speak lies of each other at night
And in the name of that flag
Come day, they continue to fight
All through the day and all through the night
They tell you who's wrong and the tell you who's right
They wave the flag in each other's face
And their words are filled with profanity's lace
All in the name of a flag
In the name of a flag
Wonder, if you will
Can our nation survive?
Or do we bring on our own kill?
All in the name of a flag
Same As
Save the Phone System at the Social Security Administration
In another week, the Social Security Administration will no longer provide phone service if verifying your identity is necessary. The SSA explains that they are fighting fraud, and fraudsters are having a heyday stealing identities and siphoning off money from the intended recipients.
That's a worth endeavor, you might suggest. But I suggest we could have all the security necessary without throwing away the phone. Customer service once was something important, and the new government -- the Trump / Musk administration -- is failing to recognize that.
And a secure system is possible.
Voice recognition is being used to verify telephone identity by various entities. Why not the SSA use it, then? Let's go ahead and recognize voices can be captured and words changed by the modern AI systems. It's called voice spoofing. Criminals record someone's voice, then mimic it. It's even possible to synthesize someone's voice to create what is known as a "deepfake voice."
But that can be dealt with. Have the system set up so the voice recognition is required throughout the conversation. Your voice has to match throughout as questions and answers are bounced back and forth. Let's see if the voice spoofers and deepfakes can maneuver past that obstacle.
But there is more that should be done prevent fraudsters from hijacking your Social Security checks. They have to have a bank account to put it in, right? Too often, the requirements for setting up a bank account are lax. Banks compete for customers and the bank that makes setting up an account the easiest often wins the prize.
So, hold the banks accountable. Make them be the ones who must verify in person. As is, a person can open an account online through identity theft. Steal the Social Security card. Steal the driver's license. Steal the birthdate and the whatever information is required. As it is now, you can send the image of the driver's license and Social Security card online. Don't allow the banks to be so careless.
And, if they are, hit them with criminal penalties. This is not a slight thing they are allowing. Put their feet to the fire.
And, thirdly, make a better effort to chase down the criminals. Throw them in jail. In today's society, they live large, not often getting prosecuted. Police investigations are often shallow, with the police explaining they don't have enough time.
Make time. If you have to hire more officers, do it.
And speaking of hiring more people, if the SSA needs to hire more people to make this work, it should. Musk is hell bent on cutting. Cut, cut, cut is all he thinks; that's his mindset. But having a smooth-operating SSA is more important than having a lean one. Government is there to serve the people, so that is the way it should be designed. A government so lean that it doesn't fulfill its purpose is useless.
Hold the Phone
Yes, You Scare Me, Donald Trump
When Only Praises can be Sung
The free press, I guess you know what that is
Let me tell you what it isn't
It isn't when something's happening
And you're not allowed to be present
The Associated Press
Has been banned from the White House
Reuters and HuffPost also can't come
Unless they sneak in quite as a mouse
Once an independent group
Decided who was in the press pool
But when Trump took office
He snapped away that jewel
He now decides who comes and goes
And guards more carefully
And if you ask hard questions
He responds like a big bully
The free press isn't free
When you have to watch your tongue
No, the free press will disappear
If only praises can be sung
A Bad Marriage
Lady Liberty and Donald Trump
Married in November 2023
And there is nothing but sadness
In this marriage decree
The bride gave him her hand
And rings, they exchanged
But little did she know
How her husband was deranged
The honeymoon was short
With who he was becoming clear
Just another abusive husband
Yes, a raging one, I fear
He sent some children far away
And locked others in their rooms
Then he went golfing
On Sunday afternoons
He riled all the neighbors
Claiming they owed him money
And soon his wife became dissatisfied
And no longer called him honey
If You didn't Care Then
If you didn't care thenWhere Could this Lead?
Just one stateTrump is That Rogue Actor
Trump's people purposely tried to outstep the court by getting the planes over international waters before anyone could stop them. The border czar has said "I don't care what the judges think." Trump and his administration are blatantly thumbing their noses at America's judicial system. "I'm the border czar," Tom Homan says, which suggests he believes he can do what he wants and has higher authority than the courts.
Over and Over and Over
The New America
Two quotes from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick today underscore what America has become. Lutnick, being interviewed by Fox News host Martha MacCallum, asked this question of Canada:
"What are you doing for us?"
At another point in the interview, Lutnick laid down the first rule Trumpism: "America first." "The starting point is that we care about America first," he said.
America has become a me-me-me nation. Me first. Give me, give me, give me.
Caring about our own is good. But somehow, we have wandered beyond that -- wandered into callousness. Giving no thought to others is not something we should practice.
Battle of Kursk
The Battle of Kursk in World War IIFollowing news of the new Ukraine deal, I and AI (the AI on my computer is Copilot) entered a discussion. Yes, it was just like having a discussion with one of you - kind of. Anyway, I thought you would be interested in what we had to say to each other, so here is the full thread:
Me:
Putin is dead set against Ukraine getting in NATO. Why? It seems to me that if he doesn't plan on attacking Ukraine, he shouldn't care. But if he does plan on attacking, then he doesn't want NATO to step in and help Ukraine?
Copilot:
Ukraine has historically been within Russia's sphere of influence due to several factors:
Historical Ties: Ukraine and Russia share deep historical, cultural, and linguistic connections. Many Ukrainians speak Russian, and the two countries have intertwined histories dating back to the Kievan Rus' period in the 9th century.
Economic Dependence: Ukraine has been economically dependent on Russia for energy supplies, particularly natural gas. Russia has used this dependency to exert political pressure on Ukraine.
Political Influence: Russia has sought to maintain political influence in Ukraine by supporting pro-Russian politicians and parties. This influence was evident during the presidency of Viktor Yanukovych, who pursued closer ties with Russia before being ousted in 2014.
Military Presence: Russia has maintained a military presence in Ukraine, most notably through the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and support for separatist movements in Eastern Ukraine.
Geopolitical Strategy: Russia views Ukraine as a buffer state against NATO and Western influence. By keeping Ukraine within its sphere of influence, Russia aims to prevent NATO's expansion and maintain its strategic security interests.
These factors contribute to Russia's ongoing efforts to assert control and influence over Ukraine. What are your thoughts on this complex relationship?
Copilot:
Under President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Ukraine has been striving to reduce Russian influence and strengthen its ties with the West. However, the ongoing conflict with Russia and the geopolitical dynamics still present challenges:
Military Conflict: The war with Russia continues to be a significant factor. Russia's military presence in Eastern Ukraine and the annexation of Crimea have kept Ukraine under constant threat.
Political Pressure: Russia continues to exert political pressure on Ukraine. The Trump administration's recent actions have further complicated the situation, with the US pushing Ukraine to make concessions to Russia.
Economic Strain: The conflict has strained Ukraine's economy, making it difficult for the country to fully break free from Russian influence. The need for security guarantees and economic support from the West remains critical.
Geopolitical Strategy: Russia's broader strategy to maintain influence over former Soviet states continues to impact Ukraine. Zelenskyy has warned that without reliable security guarantees, Russia could pose an even greater threat in the future.
Despite these challenges, Zelenskyy and his administration are determined to pursue a path of independence and closer integration with Western institutions. The situation remains complex and fluid, with ongoing negotiations and international dynamics playing a crucial role.
What are your thoughts on Ukraine's current situation?
Copilot:
It's a hopeful sign that Ukraine's interests are being more directly represented. What do you think this means for the future of the conflict?
Copilot:
European nations have pledged to increase their defense spending and provide more military aid to Ukraine. However, replacing the extensive military intelligence and support that the US has been providing will take time and coordination. The ceasefire could be a strategic move by Zelenskyy to buy time and ensure that European support is in place before any further escalation.
It’s a complex situation, and the next steps will be crucial for Ukraine’s future. What do you think will be the key factors in determining the success of this strategy?
Copilot:
Absolutely, public opinion can be a powerful force in shaping political decisions. The backlash against Trump's previous stance on Ukraine likely played a role in the shift towards a more supportive approach. Public pressure can indeed influence leaders to take actions that align with the broader sentiment of their constituents.
As for the ceasefire, it provides a crucial window for Ukraine to bolster its defenses and secure more substantial support from Europe. The ability to leverage public opinion and international support will be key in maintaining pressure on Russia and ensuring that Ukraine's interests are protected.
It's a delicate balancing act, but with the right strategy and continued public support, there's hope for a more stable and secure future for Ukraine.
Copilot:
You're very welcome, John! I'm always here to help. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to reach out. 😊
A Guest in the White House
If you could be a guest at the White House
And gain the president's ear
What kind of advice would you give him?
Besides what he wants to hear?
Abortion, immigration
What would you have to say?
Would you straighten him out on a lot of things?
Would you have some sway?
Would the nation be better
Just because you were a simple guest?
I'm asking because it would be neat
If someone could pass this test
In Ukraine
Killed and Never Coming Back
Small Man Must
War is not friend to anyone on the front lines
Not to any who take the shrapnel wounds
No, all the kind words given to war
Are from those tucked safely in back rooms
The large man makes the war
And leaves the small man to fight it
The large man calls for blood
And it's the small man who must provide it
Along with the Savings, Consider the Costs
If Trump got his way, the Department of Education would vanish. And how much money would that save us? No small sum -- $268 billion dollars.
For the slash-and-gash fans, that goes a reasonable distance in solving our deficit woes. Somebody has suggested we shouldn't be spending more than we make, right?
But as important as gaining control of our spending is, other things are all so important. Let me float you a host of questions.
What of the student loan programs? More than half of our undergraduates receive federal loans to help pay for their college educations.
What of the jobs that will be lost if student loans are axed? Each college in the nation has a crew that administers the loans. Perhaps at some of these colleges, the role of dibbing out the loans might be a side task - I don't know. I do know it is a full-time assignment at many colleges. That is a lot of people heading for the unemployment line.
Speaking of people hitting the unemployment line, about 4,400 are employed by the Department of Education itself?
How about the people teaching special education? How many are there? Will they, too, lose their jobs, or will state and local funding be found?
How about those in DEI functions at our schools scattered across the U.S. Trump clearly would like to do away with these positions, but how many of them are there that we should be setting them up for unemployment?
Will the quality of education suffer? Federal spending soared in the '50s through the '70s as we sought to stay ahead of the Soviet Union in education. Is that no longer important?
How much time should state and local entities have to prepare for assuming the functions and expenses now carried by the DOE?
Will some children be left behind? Some state and local governments might take on all the functions, but others will choose not to -- or be unable to financially.
Don't just slash and burn, Mr. President. Along with considering the savings, consider the costs.
The Art of the Deal
There is irony in this: We live in a nation where we are told we will lose our freedom if we lose our weapons; the government will first take our guns, then take our freedom.
Freedom fades where guns are no longer found.
And now Trump has defunded the supply of weapons to Ukraine. I guess the moral of the story is, never fight with a borrowed gun. The Ukrainians are rallying to find weapons from other sources but, as Trump has observed, they don't have a chance without his help. He refers to it as their not having the cards, the U.S. has them all.
Cards, guns -- whichever. Depends on whether you're playing poker or fighting a war.
Have you ever seen on of those old westerns where a gun-less man gets in a fight and someone throws him a gun so he can defend himself? That's Zelenskyy and Trump. Zelenskyy is in a fight and Trump is refusing to throw him a gun. Well, not completely refusing to toss him a gun. He notes Zelenskyy has a mine up in the hills and exchange for half of what's in it, he'll toss Zelenskyy a gun.
Whoever thought the art of a deal would ever come to a gunfight.
That's Cool by Me
I watched it, the entire 50-minute video of the Trump-Zelenskyy meeting. I found nothing offensive by Zelenskyy. He disagreed, that's all. He pointed out the numerous times Putin had broken signed agreements. He noted nobody stopped Putin from 2014-2022, which didn't square with Trump saying Putin never broke any agreements during his presidency. He wondered out loud what kind of diplomacy is possible with Putin since Putin never keeps his word. He said there needs to be security measures while Trump said he was not worried about security. Offering your viewpoints to the president of the United States should not be considered offensive. He stood up for his nation; that's cool by me.
Shakedown in the Oval Office
America First Needs a Makeover