Tuesday, January 20, 2026
Greenland’s People Probably Wouldn’t Meet Trump’s Criteria
If Greenland is taken over by the United States, don’t expect it to become the 51st state. No — it isn’t going to happen. Now, you might notice that when Trump spoke of taking over Canada, he suggested they could become the 51st state. We are told he was just joking, but he made the suggestion just the same. Well, when it came time to discuss Greenland, such a suggestion was not made, not even jokingly.
Greenland just doesn’t fit the mold Trump wants. Correction: not Greenland itself, but the people. Remember, this is the Trump who once spoke of Haiti and African countries as being “s---hole countries.”
And also remember that this is the Trump who has explicitly questioned why the U.S. receives immigrants from poorer nations rather than wealthier ones.
The Inuit of Greenland are hardly well‑to‑do people. Some might even call them a downtrodden people. Trump wants people who will be “assets” to America. I hardly think the fishermen of Greenland would meet his criteria.
Of course, when the U.S. has acquired new territory, it has always taken time before those territories became states. And it is Congress that grants statehood anyhow. I’m just saying: if the decision were left to Trump, I doubt he would throw his arms around them and make the people citizens.
Sunday, January 18, 2026
Saturday, January 17, 2026
Greenland could use a brother —
The land just wants to be free.
The land just wants to be free.
Yes, the land just wants to be free.
Thursday, January 15, 2026
Tuesday, January 13, 2026
Shoot
and in heaven, there’s a price to pay.
Where Is the Arrest, or the Suspension of Officer Ross?
Days and days later, where is the arrest? Suspects are often arrested at the scene or shortly afterward. Yes, they are often arrested before the investigation is complete. Not so, though, with Officer Jonathan Ross — or, if he has been arrested, it has not been reported.
Has Officer Ross even been placed on administrative leave? The FBI has not disclosed as much. It would be an appropriate action — but it apparently hasn’t happened with Officer Jonathan Ross.
These two facts should sharpen the criticism that the FBI may not be impartial. They should serve as tell‑tale signs that the FBI might conceivably spin the investigation to protect Officer Ross.
To begin with, there is a conflict of interest when a federal officer is being investigated by a federal agency.
And secondly, the boss above both agencies (that would be Donald) has provided verbal comments that could influence the investigation — as has Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Can we expect a fair investigation? You judge.
Sunday, January 11, 2026
Saturday, January 10, 2026
Did the FBI Doctor the Video?
Laura Ingraham, I simply disagree. I watched the officer's video you presented during your newscast and ... well ... It seems clear the ICE officer was aside the SUV -- not in front of it -- when the shots were fired. Worse, it appears the video was doctored, perhaps not with the intent of hiding the truth, but with the same effect, the same. Try the freeze frame approach. Stop the video right before the shooting. Look at the angle of the cellphone. Judge where the officer would need to be for the angle to be as it is. He would probably be beside the SUV, not in front. But wait! Notice how narrow the video image is! On each side, the picture appears to have been cropped! If it weren't for that cropping, you would be better able to determine if he was indeed to the side of the SUV. If the FBI did doctor the video before releasing it, can we trust it to impartially investigate the case? Another thing, time after time we are hearing that Renee Good tried to run over Officer Jonathan Ross. That argument fails to recognize that Good was turning sharply to get to the right of Ross. Since when, if you are trying to hit someone, do you turn sharply away from them?
Friday, January 9, 2026
I've never seen Lord of the Flies —
Thursday, January 8, 2026
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
Tuesday, January 6, 2026
The Global President
Monday, January 5, 2026
Sunday, January 4, 2026
City-Owned Grocery Stores
Friday, January 2, 2026
Minnesota was Simply Negligent
The fraud case rumbling out of Minnesota? That state was completely negligent. And it is my personal experience that brings me to say this. A few years ago, I worked for a company that was community‑minded (C.R. England) and involved us in volunteer work. I was asked to monitor (“audit,” if you will) one school, visiting sometimes announced and other times unannounced to ensure that the food was actually being distributed.
In Minnesota, the perpetrators of the fraud simply created a supposed roll of children receiving meals. Many didn’t even have kitchens or facilities to prepare the food. In Utah, such fraud would not be possible. I would have caught it on my first unannounced visit. Checking with Copilot (AI), I learned that such monitoring also takes place in Utah’s childcare program. Note also that federal regulations require this kind of oversight. There was simply no good excuse for Minnesota not monitoring its programs.
And it wasn’t just one program being fraudulently used, but several. Minnesota had a systemic problem. Checks and balances were absent throughout various welfare programs. The state was simply and plainly negligent.
Thursday, January 1, 2026
Michael, I Miss You
Michael, I'm sorry.