Is there even such a thing as a witness in Trump's favor? Is so much as one person who could testify that they were in position to know whether the President dangled money before the Ukrainians in exchange for going after Biden, and, no, it just didn't happen? Is there even so much as just one person in all the White House, or in all the diplomatic world dealing with Ukraine who could say, I would have known if that was going down, and, it just didn't happen. If there is such a person, why haven't they stepped forward.
No? Not a single person to be found to exonerate the President? None?
Can we find just one person who would have been willing to come to the Senate trial, and testify under oath on the President's behalf? An oath is a serious thing. If we put them under oath, would they be willing to say they know the accusations are false? Why was no such person found?
It leads me to the conclusion that the President is, indeed, guilty as charged.
If you have a trial, and you cannot produce a single witness in your favor, how do you ever get acquitted? Well, President Trump is pulling it off. It would be impossible in any honest court of law. We speak of how this is the first Senate impeachment trial that did not allow witnesses. Well, it is also surely one of the few trials in all of America's history in which no witness could be found for the defendant, and yet he was set free. The Senate court is letting the President off, anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment