If in February he was caught in the act, why in November is it so illegal to be asking Robert Flynn about his lying? He had already lost his job because of lying to Vice-President Pence before he went in and spoke to the FBI agents and -- once again -- got in trouble for lying.
It was February, 2017, when he was forced to resign after not being truthful with Vice-President Mike Pence about contacts with the Russians. And, it was not until December 1 of that year that he admitted in a plea agreement with the FBI that he had lied. (I would guess the interview for that plea agreement might have taken place in November.)
Why is it accepted that he lied to Pence, but when it comes out in the FBI plea agreement, that is inadmissible evidence? We suddenly say investigators were wrong to even be interviewing him about his lying. If way back in February the president had accepted his resignation for lying, however now is the president saying Flynn should not have been convicted?
(Note: Blog altered 5/13/20)
No comments:
Post a Comment