I do so wonder why some claim evolution of man is a scientific fact. I do not see that. At all. I find the theory flies in the face of scientific evidence. If evolution is a law of nature, it does not stop. If man evolved once, why not again? If we have evolved, why would we not evolve some more? Or, why should a second advanced species not evolve? Why must we look back at all of recorded history without seeing one incident of man evolving from another being, or another being evolving into man?
If science is to be science, these things must be considered as not only the lack of scientific evidence for the evolution of man, but the presence of scientific evidence against the evolution of man.
Though I wonder that indeed the evolution of man might have occurred, it does seem science and the evidence we have stands against, not for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment